Stress, Cognitive Distortions, and Emotional Dysregulation among Psychologists

Abstract

This quantitative study aimed to assess the relationship between stress, cognitive distortion, and emotional dysregulation among psychologists. A convenient sampling method was employed to collect data from 200 participants aged between 25 and 50 years (M=36.38, SD=4.70). Individuals filled out self-report forms, which included a Demographic Questionnaire, Perceived Stress Scale, Cognitive Distortion Scale, and Emotional Dysregulation Scale. The research included psychologists from different clinical settings, and formal consents were diligently obtained. Results revealed significant correlations between self-criticism, predictive thinking, and emotional dysregulation. Perceived stress demonstrated a positive association with emotional dysregulation, emphasizing its notable impact. Moreover, stress-creating thinking contributed to perceived stress. The regression analysis highlighted age as a minimal predictor, while perceived stress and various cognitive distortions collectively explained 32% of the variance in emotional dysregulation. Noteworthy predictors included stress-creating thinking, self-blame/self-criticism, and rigid thinking as negative predictors, while predictive thinking emerged as a positive predictor of emotional dysregulation. The study suggests that stress and cognitive distortion, especially predictive thinking, contribute to emotional dysregulation among psychologists. Implications underscore the significance of organizational policies, professional development programs, and refined psychology curricula to address psychologists' well-being, subsequently impacting client outcomes. Overall, these findings contribute to the understanding of the factors influencing emotional well-being in the field of psychology.