Abstract:
This study to aims to explore and highlights the Proximization strategies used in editorial of
DAWN and Tribune after APS attack, prevent national action plan issued by the government of
Pakistan. The National Action Plan was proved by the government of Pakistan on the 24th of
December 2014. The theory of legitimization selected as a theoretical framework and the
Proximization theory selected as an analytical framework for the present study and the data
analysis of the selected texts was guided by the Spatial, Temporal and Axiological (STA) model.
The STA model develops as the paper looks at the multi-faceted phenomenon of legitimization
of action sought by Pakistani government in front of their audiences. To explain this
phenomenon the thesis describes of linguistics accounts. It is emphasised that the openness and
ill-defined borders linguistic theory might cause overdetermination of analysis, either by the
bottom-level category of the actual language constructs or by the regulating categories of
analysis. In analysis, this overdetermination can be countered, but only if an unusual "checks and
balances" mechanism is put in place during the investigation. Language data must be defined in
constant contact with the underlying social premise, which must itself regulate the evolution of
analysis. First, linguistic categories must be positioned at various levels of analysis. The studies
begins with the definition of "legitimization," which is consistent with the latter assumptions.
Considering this, the example has been spellbindingly broke down for the semantic decisions
that demonstrate the spatial, temporl , and axiological proximization of the danger of harmony,
in the illumination of proximization hypothesis (Cap 2013). The proof gathered during the
examination lays out that the specialists use proximization systems in illness avoidance talk to
add to the apprehension bid which helps in requesting genuine and fast legitimization of the
proposed game plan against the spreading danger of harmony.
