dc.description.abstract |
The presence of naturally occurring evaporation duct (ED) phenomenon is very high in
the tropical/equatorial regions of the world. Although, refractivity estimation of EM
and Radio waves in ED is well studied in the literature, still, the signal propagation
through ED over-the-horizon needs to be thoroughly researched to help determine the
received-signal-strength-level (RSSL) for a reliable wireless communication link. In
order to accurately predict RSSL in ED, we have acquired RSSL (avg.) per-minute data
for three months over-the-horizon distance of 50 km (Tx-Rx) from onshore-to-offshore
Oil & Gas Platform. This data was collected using fixed antenna heights in ED.
Applying deep learning algorithms on real-time RSSL data, we have nowcasted the
future RSSL values for next 5 seconds timescale in this thesis. A thorough comparison
is made between the CNN and LSTM deep learning methods for real-time series
prediction analysis. These deep learning networks are linked with numerous
convolution layers to grasp the nonlinear mapping between measured and future RSSL
values. Coding and Simulation work is performed in Python 3.9 environment and
results are generated in Kaggle Notebook. CNN and LSTM networks have never been
used earlier for predicting “signal strength” over-the-horizon and over-the-sea under
ED environment. The contribution of this research is to bridge this gap and examine
the accuracy of LSTM and CNN for nowcasting RSSL data. According to what we've
discovered, both of these neural network models are capable of achieving adequate to
high prediction power given that the "datasets" are suitably big. Both methods, when
taken as a whole, are reliable with regard to their hyperparameters. However, with
increasing number of training courses, LSTM didn’t improve its performance, whereas
CNNs performed correspondingly more accurate each time. For 3rd training, CNN has
given the most optimal fitting of training data as compare to test data. The RMSE
achieved for CNN after third training was 4.47 which is the least of all simulations.
Hence, CNNs proved to be superior, since they operate one order of magnitude quicker
than LSTM. We proposed that the early predictive capability, speed, and resilience of
CNN open its door to nowcasting’s future. |
en_US |